Steffee,
Wonderful explanation! Especially since I haven't read any of those works or heard a doppelganger explained before. I have seen them in two literary works but never before knew what a 'familiar' was, as in 'the Devil's familiar.' But now it occurs to me that those fleeting glimpses of Quilty in
Lolita sound, at a stretch, like fleeting appearances of the Devil's familiar, meaning Quilty's familiar, which is present whenever Humbert is engaged in doing some evil thing. And now that I type that sentence, it is
not present during HH's final meeting and conversation wiith Lolita.
Your suggestion of doppelganger really opens wide the door to symbolic interpretaion(s) of Lolita, and places it truly among some of the most amazing works of world literature (Goethe's
Faust, and Bulgakov's
Master and Margarita, being two that I have read.)
--
As for that discussion, there were 18 posts in 27 minutes, which must be amazing in it own way. And it really was the case that typing and posting were overlapping and it would take multiple screens to sort out the linear thread above. But at one point, definnitely, two doppelgangers were typing the same cloned thoughts on two different keyboards miles apart. Amazing!
--
Can't let it go! So:
Quilty == Devil?
Humbert == Faust?
Lolita == Margaret?
That would absolutely blow the mind as an interpretation. But no! Humbert as Faust, even to say it, would be a desecration. And the dramatic conflicts aren't the same. So what do you thinK about a closest fit for
Lolita in the world of Doppelganger stories? Or did Nabokov do it again -- create a unique concept?
It's time for the world to turn a little to let the rest of the partygoers wake up.
But, wow,
Steffee! You really ripped it!
Peder