Well... the books spans over a hundred years, so I've read.
And I love the underlying psychology in Lolita the most, I think. I love the language too, I love that I've learned what
solopsism means, and
hebophile, and
nymphet of course, and
coltish, and
apropos, and tons more interesting words. The story of Lolita on it's own could have been much much less interesting, and influential, had it been written by just an ordinary writer. But I like the psychology best, and Ada (or Ardor: A Family Chronicle) is apparently a memoir of a "psychologist, professor of philosophy, and student of time."
I do think (from the reviews I've read on
Ada so far), that it is like a What We Wish Lolita Could Have Been -- there's an contoversial romance, incest rather than pedophilic (if there is such a word) and after seventeen years apart, they find one another again. Awww!!
And then there's the "time" thing, how the professor of philosophy, Ivan (Van) Veen tries to seperate "time" from "space", in order to change the future. I love philosophy and have even done a module for my degree in it, but the "time" thing always makes me feel sick to think about. It sounds interesting.
Um... what else? Well, I've read
Anna Karenina, which influenced this novel, and I have read many of Joyce's works (even an attempt at
Finnegan's Wake). I haven't read Proust, but maybe after this I may want to!
But
The Enchanter is calling my name too.