Peder
Well-Known Member
Pontalba,pontalba said:The basis for my reasoning goes back centuries, when land being inherited by the children (sons) of the land holder were the one wielding the power. Land was Power. Kingdoms and the like depended on the proper passing of the land/power. Still does as far as that goes. I wasn't only speaking of literature induced theories.
Nuttin' feminist about that can of worms.
But I wasn't clear enough in my previous post.
I was less than clear also.
No doubt that can of worms you mention is all masculine worms. And I think that is exactly what modern-day feminists would point to as males arranging society, and the power to run it, to suit themselves. Some further would argue that literature that does not challenge that arrangement, in effect endorses it, and therefore aids in it continuance. And not much literature challenged male dominance until recent years, certainly not literature written by male authors.
With two modern daughters, I have learned that there are a whole 'nother set of P's & Q's regarding gender issues that I have to mind carefully.
So it wasn't so much what you were saying that caused my response, as much as the fact that the discussion was of gender-based outlooks themselves. And my thought was that gender-based discussions of any sort, even of literature, do not pass quietly in certain quarters. So I commented from a different viewpoint, hopefully without ruffling feelings.
Peder